When I red the link in your Bentley post Madmax my first thought was identical to Peter`s... In the recent past Jaguar did much the same thing, all of which may be based upon thinking relative to the many companies who have created what are essentially updated former classics..? I suspect the idea being to make old cars fit more with the requirements of ageing would be owners who may have lusted after such machines when younger,either that or to match the expectations of younger drivers by perhaps introducing so many of the comfort, bling and toys that so many seem to be desirous of today..? I note like Jaguar it seems Bentley are perhaps seeking to make an accurate replica of the original as opposed to an updated version..?
The whole RETRO market seemed to begin around the time Audi brought the TT to market followed by the VW Beetle on something like the then current Golf floor pan (?) Of course the market opened up into Eagle E Types and Singer 911`s and so many more.
In Porsche terms it seems perhaps tuning for ever more power and improving handling to match the new found power and more expensive engineering as interpreted in that which RUF built into 911/930 Porsches, perhaps evolved in time for RUF to also include a degree of bling..? I suspect it all seems an entirely natural progression...What next I wonder... ?
But then I suspect if you paid out a bazillion for a Ferrari 250 GTO, you might be none too happy if Ferrari began to build another group of GTO`s for a quarter bazillion..?
From a very dull memory, if I think back to when Jaguar recreated their D Type clones they found some old chassis numbers that had never been registered, perhaps the original cars destroyed in the Browns Rd fire before reaching customers..? Such important details can add real value...perhaps..?
All this takes me back to the lengthy legal wrangles over Old No 1 that ended up in the high court of England...

The thing is will those recreated Bentleys run on E10...
