Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
6 members (Dougie, DavidR, Mogdavid, RichardV6, BobJ, SteveMerch), 336 guests, and 40 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 65
Adam12 62
John V6 59
Newest Members
Chris Ontario, NickMog, YellowM, Dufty, Anted4
9,215 Registered Users
Newest Topics
For saleWood rim moto-lita
by hugo - 30/07/25 04:28 PM
For Sale 2015 M3W - £23,000
by MOG42 - 29/07/25 06:28 PM
AC Cobra Rep. Vs Plus 8
by Richardllll - 29/07/25 04:40 PM
Me Again
by Whizjet - 29/07/25 03:13 PM
Tyre dates on Yokohama tyres
by SteveMerch - 29/07/25 12:39 PM
Aero 8 Maintenance
by mph - 29/07/25 09:24 AM
Pur Sang Type 35
by BillHart - 28/07/25 06:49 PM
Latest Photos
Moto-lita for sale
Moto-lita for sale
by hugo, July 30
2015 M3W for sale
2015 M3W for sale
by MOG42, July 29
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,364
Posts813,344
Members9,215
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
L
Luddite Offline OP
Part of the Furniture
OP Offline
Part of the Furniture
L
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
Can any Telegraph readers confirm whether or not there is any truth in that it seems as the result of public consultation (!) that there may be consideration to bring back MOT or similar checks for vehicles over 40 years old, which in the UK are no longer subjected to such checks...?

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,232
Likes: 125
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,232
Likes: 125
Searching online, it looks like the same story was carried by several newspapers. The best explanation was on thisismoney.co.uk and to seems to have come from the FBHVC.


Originally Posted by thisismoney
However, the Federation wants a new MOT-esque test applicable only to historic vehicles that have undergone major restructuring or modifications, and for it to be a 'one-off' test.
The new test would, like an MOT, 'assess the vehicle with reference to the technical standards applicable when it was new' but would be a 'more in-depth inspection than the MOT' the FBHVC says.

Further ideas submitted by the Federation in the call for evidence include possible 'dismantling to permit full access to all parts of the vehicle'.

While this might seem like extra hoops to jump through for classic car owners, the organisation (which represents the wishes of owners, individuals and traders to government and legislators) is in fact trying to simplify the issues with current historic vehicle registrations.

At present Individual Vehicle Approval is not compatible with newly restored or retrofitted classic vehicles and is 'entirely inappropriate and not suitable in this context' according to the Federation.


Link to full article: here

Last edited by Paul F; 28/12/24 05:56 PM.

Paul
Costock, UK
2014 4/4 Rolls Royce Garnet Red
Disco 5
Teddy - 17h1 Irish Draught cross
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 318
Charter Member
Online Content
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 318
Doesn't sound from the above that it would worry genuine 'historics' .... might be a response to.potentially 0-60 in 2.7 secs and 160 mph Austin A35s with Tesla powertrains grafted under them by the crop of unregulated 'electrifiers' that have sprung up (and LS swapped invalid carriages! 🙂)

K

Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
L
Luddite Offline OP
Part of the Furniture
OP Offline
Part of the Furniture
L
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
Thanks to Paul`s link, I jumped into the FBHVC website and there seems to be no excitement in the News section, though there is an existing page with all the relevant info re DVLA regs relative to the subject..

As to what or what is not a modified vehicle...? Finding originality in the Morgan community...???..

https://fbhvc.co.uk/mot-exemption-information

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,868
Likes: 138
Scruffy Oik
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Scruffy Oik
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,868
Likes: 138
TBH making sure that any car, modified or not, regardless of age is subjected to regular safety checks to make sure it's not going to put people at risk strikes me as an entirely sensible idea.


Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
1 member likes this: Graham, G4FUJ
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
L
Luddite Offline OP
Part of the Furniture
OP Offline
Part of the Furniture
L
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
I suspect there may well be increasing risks with the passage of time relative to the health and wealth of baby boomers in terms of their ability to maintain their formerly self maintained +40 year old machinery, with the obvious combination of risks so attached....?
Fortunately for me, I can still roll around the floor enough to carry out basic maintenance on my Morgan, crawling around greasing things, nut, bolt and brake checks, though getting back up is perhaps the most difficult part....Hmm...

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 35,791
Likes: 471
Tricky Dicky
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Tricky Dicky
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 35,791
Likes: 471
A thorough medical of the drivers over 55 is more important to my way of thinking, being in charge (or not) of a vehicle capable of mass destruction should be treated seriously as it is in the aviation world. sherlock irrespective of age !


2009 4/4 Henrietta
1999 Indigo Blue +8
2009 4/4 Sport Green prev
1993 Connaught Green +8 prev





1 member likes this: Alistair
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 161
J
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
J
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 161
All ages should have a regular and thorough medical before getting behind a wheel of a car. Age may generally create infirmity, but the younger generation ability to drive needs to be questioned more. Note number 9 in particular below. re mobile phone usage. Its becoming too easy to scape goat elderly. when its young men who are the greatest offenders.

Top 12 Distracted Driving Facts & Statistics in the UK Between 2014 and 2019, a total of 133 fatalities and 446 serious accidents were directly linked to drivers being distracted by their phones – that’s an average of one major incident every three days.

1.Approximately 25,000 people are killed or suffer serious injuries in road accidents every year.
2.Approximately 2,500 accidents a year are caused by a distraction inside the vehicle.
3.1% of all drivers use a mobile phone while driving.
4, 11 million UK motorists admit to using a mobile phone while driving.
5,16% of drivers have admitted to texting or messaging while driving.
6.3% of drivers say they text or message every time they drive.
7 Using a hands-free phone reduces reaction time to 30% slower than at the drink-drive limit.
8 HGV drivers are the most likely to use a handheld mobile device while driving.
9 Young drivers aged 25–34 are almost twice as likely to use a mobile phone while driving.
10 As well as mobile phones, distractions inside the vehicle can include infotainment systems, satellite navigation systems, and headphone use.
11 Personal grooming makes a driver three times more likely to be involved in a collision.
12 Reading newspapers, magazines, and other printed materials makes a collision three times more likely.


Mortality statistics and road traffic accidents in the UK
An RAC Foundation Briefing Note for the UN Decade of Action for Road Safety


In 2009 2,605 people died in road traffic accidents in the UK. While this made
up only 0.5% of all deaths in the UK in that year, for those in the 15-19 age
group road accidents account for 25% of all deaths. What’s more, fatal
accidents on the roads are largely preventable.

The largest number of deaths in the UK result from conditions such as heart
disease (33% of all deaths), cancer (28% of all deaths) and respiratory
diseases (14% of all deaths).

External causes of death, which tend to be less disease and medical
focused, accounted for 3.8% of all fatalities in 2009. Road traffic accidents
make up 13% of all external causes of death. For the 10-14 age group road
accidents make up over 50% of all external causes of death.

15-19 years olds experience almost double the risk of death from road traffic
accidents (82.5 deaths per million population) in comparison to the general
population (42.2 deaths per million population). For males in this age group
the risk is higher still at 127.3 deaths per million population.

There is also a significant and notable disparity between the deaths caused
by road traffic accidents between men and women, with men being over three
times as likely to die from a road accident.

Deaths from road traffic accidents are much more prevalent amongst the
under 25s than other causes of death often reported by the media such as
hangings, shootings, stabbings, alcohol or drug abuse. Between the ages of
15-24 a young person is twice as likely to die from a road traffic accident than
be fatally assaulted by firearms, a sharp/blunt object or intentional self-harm
via hanging combined. Those in the 15-24 age category are also four times
more likely to die from a road traffic accident than from drug, alcohol or other
substance poisoning.


I believe all vehicles should be subjected to an annual safety check irrespective of age, During Covid when MOT's were extended the level of vehicle safety fell (as it does during times of COL pressures), you cannot rely on people to do the right thing and vehicle safety and maintenance can be very low on the agenda in cash strapped families.......the number of vehicles on the road without RFL. Insurance and MOT is enormous, its currently estimated to be in excess of 400,000 vehicle on the road without an MOT

Last edited by JohnHarris; 29/12/24 12:11 PM.

Prev '12 Plus 4 Sport OZZY
'08 Roadster FELIX
'06 4/4 70th LOKI
'77 4/4 SEAMUS
'85 4/4 MOLLY
1 member likes this: Graham, G4FUJ
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 318
Charter Member
Online Content
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 318
Dredging my memory but I remember a study that had distraction from children in the back as the number one, with phones number two .... as demonising Mums on the school-run was deemed bad political optics it was glossed over and phones targeted ... not that I want any attention to slip off phone use while driving ... something I never do and something I would see dealt with severely.

K

1 member likes this: +8Rich
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 161
J
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
J
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 161
Originally Posted by Image
Dredging my memory but I remember a study that had distraction from children in the back as the number one, with phones number two .... as demonising Mums on the school-run was deemed bad political optics it was glossed over and phones targeted ... not that I want any attention to slip off phone use while driving ... something I never do and something I would see dealt with severely.

K

Mom school runs stats supported by :- For the 10-14 age group road accidents make up over 50% of all external causes of death and 15-19 years olds experience almost double the risk of death from road traffic accidents


Prev '12 Plus 4 Sport OZZY
'08 Roadster FELIX
'06 4/4 70th LOKI
'77 4/4 SEAMUS
'85 4/4 MOLLY
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5