Lance, you keep asking rhetorical questions, which you have previously answered for yourself.
Therefore, rather than a constructive debate, this is starting to smell of trolling and an attempt to be obtuse and discredit the factory.
I'm all for lively debate but I don't see the point in trying to be contentious and argumentative for the sake of it.
I don’t think my posts had rhetorical questions, nor an attempt to discredit the factory.
How is an attempt to examine the issue of why the factory is using a third party, to produce the “Malvern Roadster” in lieu of the many established US Morgan dealers rhetorical, obtuse, or an attempt to discredit the factory? I don’t know the answer, and I am interested in opinions.
Individuals on this forum have indicated that we (US Morgan owners) are only concerned that it will devalue the existing cars, and I have heard that concern here. I already have seen one response (from Graham) that he does not believe it will have a negative impact on the existing cars. If the selling price is going to be (as I have heard) in the $80k range, I would have to agree with Graham, I don’t see a negative impact to the value of the US cars. I am sure others have opinions on this, so I don’t see this as rhetorical
I have stated that Morgan is attempting to distance itself from this venture. Asking why and throwing out a couple of possible reasons is not rhetorical and certainly open to discussion.
As far as contentious and argumentative, I do not believe that was one sided.
At this point, I guess you will determine whether the topics noted above are worthy of discussion on your site or not. As moderators of this site, you have the ownership and power to allow this discussion or to pull the plug on me.
