For me YT vids have opened access to improve my understanding of many things, just as did my first home computer, back in the mid 90`s using a dial up connection, and coincidentally at that time I was contemplating the purchase of a Morgan to restore, also right around that time the MSCC had created their forum, I must have been amongst the first to join in search of education as to the possible realities of Morgan ownership, asking the question Which Morgan, having typed a resume of my m/cycling and sports car fettling up to that point in time..to which many very kind folk took time to reply to from places as far away as Canada, Australia, Germany, NZ and the US of A, and what an education they provided to the extent that GoMoG (Lorne) from Canada, actually lined me up with a rather special Morgan available for in sale in the UK and which I bought (2002) and still own today...(-:
No YT back then but I see YT in much the same way in terms of an evolution in terms of providing additional functionality to platforms for people to ask questions and find answers from numerous folk willing to take the time to pass on information in the hope of helping out...?
For sure access to the www has advanced beyond dial up, and the format for forums has likewise advanced where not only chat but pics and vids are available on any subject, what`s more to want..?
Yeah well such are the vagaries of human nature that personality clashes seem inevitable, natural cleekish behaviour creating tribes within tribes, exacerbated by misunderstanding poor grammar and total lack of punctuation skills.... (-: Yeh well it is what it is and not everybody is as perfect as am I... and as a result many a forum ended up in self destruct mode which should be no real surprise...?
In the Porsche related link I posted the core subject matter was that Porsche had issued an official statement on issues relative to a seemingly critical issue affecting one model in their range of electrically propelled vehicles and a chap who received the official communication shared it`s contents while displaying the document as proof, hopefully negating concerns that it could all be a figment of his imagination...? He went on to suggest that as the result of Porsche`s written warning, that his insurance company would no longer provide cover for his Porsche, not only that but as he charged his car at home, his house insurance was also deemed void, due to a change in circumstances affecting the insured risk... Though as he did not name his insurance company or provide any documentary evidence, it would seem wise to take that content with a pinch of salt..? Well that was my take on the content of the vid, and which seemed to be of potential interest to others on this forum who might own or be contemplating the purchase of an EV..? No more than that.
Further to the above in a bit to seek an alternative view, I posted the second vid, and ultimately of value to me on the core subject matter, was that TM, by way of Tim, provided yet another scenario whereby it seems his chosen insurance company is happy to cover both his EV and home knowing his EV is charged in his garage at home.... Great..!
On the other hand I suspect much may depend on the passage of time and the way insurance companies react to EV risk assessments which would seem to be constantly evolving...?
