TBM, seems there is a bit of difference in the valuation of a brand name, if that is all that Nanjing got for £53 mil, when it seems someone bought the Austin brand name for £170....! All of which suggests to me that Nanjing must have aquired more than the name and all the marketing rights related to it...?
I also wonder what liabilities transferred with the Austin name.... could have been a bit of a minefield...?
