Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
4 members (Robbie, Davetherave, Ritchie B, Jens), 81 guests, and 72 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 78
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Cars and boats vid
by Luddite - 04/09/26 09:04 AM
Boats alongsidish last night
by +8Rich - 03/09/26 11:57 PM
Steering bearings
by Ricosan - 03/09/26 06:30 PM
Tyres for 1990 +8
by CJB - 03/09/26 11:16 AM
2018 Sigma 4/4 ride height
by Neville1 - 02/09/26 09:10 PM
CX moaners
by Malachy - 02/09/26 01:20 PM
Plus 4 Steering rack gaiter
by Strathaven - 02/09/26 12:42 PM
Latest Photos
Wales
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,871
Posts837,676
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Rudolf
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#801882 14/06/24 02:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
Hawki Offline OP
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
Has anyone modified their Morgan to remove the awful brake light that sticks up over the spare wheel?

It not only only looks horrible but is blocked if you have a case on the rack. On my previous car there were LED strips built into the hood which looked so much better. Will it pass an MOT if I just remove it?

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
Hawki Offline OP
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
The following written by the editor on Honest John. “ In respect of the MoT test, a high-level third brake light is considered optional but if one is fitted and connected it must work, so it is possible that the police could stop and fine a driver for a non-functioning third brake light as it does not meet the regulations.”

Last edited by Hawki; 14/06/24 02:30 PM.
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 74
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 74
From what I have come across, even if it is an original fitment, you can remove it without risk of MOT failure, as long as your other two brake lights work.. To take it further, if you simply disconnect it and tell the tester that it is disconnected, he is obliged to believe you and still pass it.
The only failure is if it is in place, connected and doesn't work due to perhaps a wiring fault or blown bulb.


Doug
2011 Plus 4 in Rich Maroon

1972 750 “ComDom” sprinter
1958 Triton 650
1992 Triumph Trophy 900
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 413
Needs to Get Out More!
Offline
Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 413
A bit of a stretch just disconnecting wiring Doug, for many testers I would imagine. Rules are if it's there it should work so complete removal only.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 413
Needs to Get Out More!
Offline
Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,684
Likes: 413
FWIW Gary whilst following John V6 the other day I noticed his cobra repeater far more than his main brake lights. Could be because his Roadster like mine has side lights on continuously so not such a noticeable difference in intensity, in daylight at least.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 258
formerly known as Hugh Jorgan
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
formerly known as Hugh Jorgan
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 258
On every trad I've owned I've always taken it off. I presume it's the same fitment, 4 big wood screws and a plastic electrical connector. I always wrapped the end of the plastic bit in insulation tape and poked it under the rear panel.
I accept why they're there and I see the benefit......however.....it's an ugly thing and lazy design....imho....
Take it off........NOW...!😁

1 member likes this: Atlantic
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
Hawki Offline OP
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
Julian! Many thanks. I may give it a try

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 74
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 74
Originally Posted by RichardV6
A bit of a stretch just disconnecting wiring Doug, for many testers I would imagine. Rules are if it's there it should work so complete removal only.
I agree Richard, but I saw that in more than one place when I googled. It seems to be based on the fact that the third brake light is not a legal necessity, unlike the normal brake lights. However, I can see the arguments developing with the MOT tester!

As a side, human nature is interesting, is it not?
We have some who spend lots of money improving their headlights, not just to see where they are going but so often said, to improve the chances of being seen by other road users.
On the other hand, a device already fitted on the rear to improve the chances of being seen when you brake…get removed.
No criticism; just saying. 🤔


Doug
2011 Plus 4 in Rich Maroon

1972 750 “ComDom” sprinter
1958 Triton 650
1992 Triumph Trophy 900
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 103
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 103
I too thought it looked ugly when I got the car, but on balance I reckon the safety-over-aesthetics wins. With the luggage rack fitted it is still visible, but I agree that it becomes completely obscured by a case. Anyhow the good news is that it is dead easy to remove.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]


Peter
2009 3-litre Roadster "Ivor", royal ivory / green
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,545
Likes: 132
S
Needs to Get Out More!
Offline
Needs to Get Out More!
S
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,545
Likes: 132
I have fitted a second removable light that goes onto the suitcase. I fitted Superseal connectors to the lead to the “Cobra’s Head” light so I can disconnect it and plug in the other light. The light was an LED one from Carbuildersolutions. I mounted it on a short length of thin hardwood as a base and teak oiled it. I simply strap this on using cheap ratchet straps. It did involve getting access to the existing light connector that is behind the plastic panel beneath the spare wheel. A bit of a fiddle moving that panel but just took care. I extended the wires so the new waterproof connector was accessible. I just tuck the excess wire down out of the way behind the spare wheel. I used it first last month on a trip to Woburn using a suitcase. Simple to swop light connections, only takes seconds.
I’ve just got leather luggage straps so will modify the light to use them instead of ratchet straps.
I’ll get a couple of photos to post.
Just to add that the car is a 2023 Plus Four. Some CX cars have high level lights built into the hood instead. Mine doesn’t.
I used to use a Bootbag not suitcase and that was low enough to not obscure the Cobra’s Head light.

Last edited by sospan; 15/06/24 09:49 AM.

Plus Four MY23 Furka Rouge
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5