|
1 members (+8Rich),
246
guests, and
35
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,911
Posts838,151
Members9,635
| |
Most Online1,063 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,750 Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,750 Likes: 158 |
This is a topic that does come up from time to time. For a person who is not wealthy owning a big engined and powerful car in Italy is very expensive, and I imagine many other European countries are too.
The trad Morgan entry point 4/4 is probably affordable to many young people, and certainly they all admire a trad. But would they want to buy one? By and large I think not. I think that the Caterham probably appeals more to some with its more powerful engine options and more modern suspension etc.
Maybe I am way off track but I agree to a large degree with Mr. 1560 except that I think the car would need a completely new platform without the complication of the Aero suspension and possibly with a different chassis. I don't really see an Aero with the V6 engine (though that would have very low development costs as the platform already exists). Even Ford are moving to replace the V6 with 4 cylinder turbocharged engines.
The car I would envisage would be more or less a Morgan bodied Caterham with some luggage space behind(enough for 2 overnight bags), all round independent suspension and a 2 litre turbo charged 4 cylinder engine. The body style I envisage would be essentially similar to the Aero Coupe but also in a soft top.
Naturally all this has to be weighed against development costs. Any new model that Morgan produced would possibly need to meet American safety and emission requirements. This means a USA model would probably need the expense of airbags and that involves high development costs. However there is a huge market there just waiting to be tapped.
Peter
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 09:06 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Freddy
|
12/06/13 11:30 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 11:39 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
12/06/13 01:28 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 02:01 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Jays
|
12/06/13 02:33 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
A11OGE
|
13/06/13 07:25 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
13/06/13 07:45 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
wiscos
|
13/06/13 07:58 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
13/06/13 01:05 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
wiscos
|
13/06/13 11:12 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 04:10 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
14/06/13 06:45 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
14/06/13 06:55 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
mr_tony
|
14/06/13 07:12 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 07:48 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Robbie
|
14/06/13 08:01 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
14/06/13 08:11 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 08:35 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
14/06/13 09:30 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 09:46 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Dean-Royal
|
14/06/13 10:15 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
14/06/13 11:31 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
mr_tony
|
14/06/13 12:16 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Dean-Royal
|
14/06/13 05:04 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Budster
|
14/06/13 05:10 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
twotribes
|
14/06/13 07:57 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
mr_tony
|
15/06/13 04:25 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
15/06/13 05:05 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
15/06/13 05:09 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
asbojohn
|
15/06/13 05:34 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Alistair
|
15/06/13 07:14 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Cicerone
|
15/06/13 01:23 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
16/06/13 06:57 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
16/06/13 07:14 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
16/06/13 08:03 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
16/06/13 02:05 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Dean-Royal
|
16/06/13 06:31 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
17/06/13 11:31 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Alistair
|
17/06/13 02:32 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
17/06/13 04:21 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
23/06/13 07:51 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
23/06/13 08:17 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Aeroman
|
23/06/13 06:22 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
24/06/13 07:08 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Aeroman
|
24/06/13 07:25 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
16/06/13 08:32 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
16/06/13 02:03 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Simon
|
12/06/13 02:15 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 03:54 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 03:55 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
12/06/13 04:33 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
13/06/13 06:23 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
13/06/13 01:00 PM
|
|
|
|