|
7 members (sewin, ProfessorM, John Winn, Carbuilder, +8Rich, Andy, TBM),
264
guests, and
64
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,896
Posts837,962
Members9,635
| |
Most Online1,063 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,564
NGUNS!! Part of the Furniture
|
NGUNS!! Part of the Furniture
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,564 |
Morgan insiders have told me that Morgan deliberately "dumbed down" the 0-60 time of the Roadster 3.7 in its advertising material because it was actually well below 5 seconds in many tests and therefore too close to the new Plus 8 and could therefore damage sales. It would be the same with a Baby Aero. I think there needs to be plenty of clear blue water between the Classic and the Aero. There is a significant performance difference between the Plus 8 and the Roadster 3.7, as we discovered on our recent trip. However, and it's a big however, the Roadster is bloody quick, and significant difference doesn't mean the Roadster driver "wouldn't see which way the Plus 8 went" or anything ridiculous like that. These days as cars get quicker and quicker the actual envelope shrinks and variances are less noticeable. I would also say that as 0-60 is also very dependant on traction and gearing, I wouldn't be too surprised if those acceleration times were close (I would suggest the Plus 4 must be six point something seconds also) as the plus 8 isn't sub 4 seconds (you'd need traction and automated box for that I would suggest). However, that isn't the whole story by a long chalk. Where the Plus 8 is further very different (and I am aware that I am biased) is for the sound, the glorious sound, and the far superior cabin and ride (plus of course airbags and ABS but I know that won't appeal to many  ). It's no secret that the Roadster was my least favourite car for the Nordkapp Trip. The engine was fantastic but the cabin and driving position was most uncomfortable. I'm quite happy to accept it may well have been my shape more than the cars that caused this but, for me this is a fact. As such, and bringing the thread back on topic, a Plus 6 (coupe or 'roadster') on the Aero chassis makes sense to me. Are there enough buyers as the cost will rise (Aero chassis plus bags and ABS will undoubtedly increase the cost)? I've no real idea. I'm guessing it won't be a lot cheaper than a Plus 8 but I guess if taxation is softer it would be a more economical choice for our European friends?
Cheers
BtG
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 09:06 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Freddy
|
12/06/13 11:30 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 11:39 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
12/06/13 01:28 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 02:01 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Jays
|
12/06/13 02:33 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
A11OGE
|
13/06/13 07:25 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
13/06/13 07:45 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
wiscos
|
13/06/13 07:58 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
13/06/13 01:05 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
wiscos
|
13/06/13 11:12 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 04:10 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
14/06/13 06:45 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
14/06/13 06:55 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
mr_tony
|
14/06/13 07:12 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 07:48 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Robbie
|
14/06/13 08:01 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
14/06/13 08:11 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 08:35 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
14/06/13 09:30 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
14/06/13 09:46 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Dean-Royal
|
14/06/13 10:15 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
14/06/13 11:31 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
mr_tony
|
14/06/13 12:16 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Dean-Royal
|
14/06/13 05:04 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Budster
|
14/06/13 05:10 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
twotribes
|
14/06/13 07:57 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
mr_tony
|
15/06/13 04:25 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
15/06/13 05:05 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
15/06/13 05:09 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
asbojohn
|
15/06/13 05:34 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Alistair
|
15/06/13 07:14 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Cicerone
|
15/06/13 01:23 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
16/06/13 06:57 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
16/06/13 07:14 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
16/06/13 08:03 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
16/06/13 02:05 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Dean-Royal
|
16/06/13 06:31 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
17/06/13 11:31 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Alistair
|
17/06/13 02:32 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
17/06/13 04:21 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
23/06/13 07:51 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
23/06/13 08:17 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Aeroman
|
23/06/13 06:22 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
24/06/13 07:08 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Aeroman
|
24/06/13 07:25 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
16/06/13 08:32 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Boshly
|
16/06/13 02:03 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Simon
|
12/06/13 02:15 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 03:54 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
1560
|
12/06/13 03:55 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Neilda
|
12/06/13 04:33 PM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Gambalunga
|
13/06/13 06:23 AM
|
Re: Why can them, why not Morgan????,
|
Quicksilver
|
13/06/13 01:00 PM
|
|
|
|