Originally Posted by Paul F
Originally Posted by +8Rich
[not one of their horses is shod, they are unnecessary if the hooves are properly tended to I have learnt from them.


That is not strictly true - despite the propaganda from the barefoot brigade.

Of our two horses, one would probably be fine if barefoot. The other would be in severe distress due to a confirmation issue that causes one of his hooves to have a weak sub-structure. Had this conversation on Monday with a barefoot "expert" who had to agree with me when she looked more closely at Teddy's feet.

Also, the UK's largest Horse Sanctuary has just over a 100 that are shod (out of around 1500) and they would not go to the extra expenses if it were not necessary.

I bow to your first hand superior knowledge here, I'm just quoting verbatim what we were told on the day, I think there is only a couple of their horses that are ridden the rest are all retired rescue jobs.

My only experience of them is that they bite and throw you off laugh2


2009 4/4 Sport Henrietta
1999 Indigo Blue +8
2009 4/4 Sport Green prev
1993 Con Green +8 prev