Accusing a new venture of "amateurish behaviour and dishonesty" on an open public forum, populated by their main target market smacks of "denying them an opportunity to flourish" IMHO.
Ah, yes, if one doesn't support anything and any behaviour it's denying someone their rights. I guess I deny Apple the rights to make money whenever I bitchslap their inferiour products or sub par after-sales "service" and sub par handling of warranty claims.
Or, let's say someone thinks that we'd be the best market to spam with some shitty watches or something else - then one should keep their mouth shut in that case too.
Seriously, if people in their marketing segment only should give them positive remarks, what the hell point is there to any discussion, or anything posted on here? Morgan make feckups too, and they should rightfully get more than apologist comments on things like that.
I realise that some people think that only positive feedback is great and that negative feedback should be kept to oneself.
You really are prolonging this aren't you?
How does accusing someone of being dishonest correlate with not supporting them? Give an opinion by all means, but measure your response according to the facts in hand.
And please stop whingeing about only giving positive remarks; nobody and I repeat nobody, is saying that. Many people have expressed unsupportive opinions and questioned the new publication; but only one person has incurred the wrath of at least three others with the way he has conducted himself and by littering his protestations with profanities. Maybe that gives you some indication?
