I guess it also depends on the angle in which the Panhard Rod is mounted.
In the 3.0 Roadster I found it so hard and uncomfortable that it was dismantled after one week.

In the Plus4SS was a Panhard Rod as standard, which did not have these negative characteristics.

To return to the question, I would mount BRB and good shock absorbers.

I wouldn't necessarily take Panhard Rod. Anti Tramp Bars...only one was installed in the 2010 3.0 Roadster. I had a second one installed with good results. This means that the force does not pull unilaterally when accelerating. In the former 2005 Roadster I had no ATB at all, and I never felt the need to have one. But the leaf springs should be strong enough not to wind up under normal acceleration. Otherwise the cardan could touch the floor tunnel. If this does not happen I guess, that no ATB could be better than only one.

And there are very experienced mechanics (e.g. in my Morgan garage) who are careful with all the additional things. With my 4/4 I also only have the 140 pounds of mulfab springs in front, AVOs adjustable around and now I get the 4 seater leaf springs for rear installed. That is all.

You could do two things wrong, one is that the car can become increasingly uncomfortable. The other thing (especially with the 4/4) is that the chassis becomes "too good"...and thus more boring in relation to the engine power.

This is just my 2 cent, everyone will answer this in a different way.

Last edited by Heinz; 18/08/18 03:51 PM.
'14 4/4 graphite grey