As for Katoens comments regarding the width, what a load of codswallop.
We are not on different sides here. You apparently feel very strongly that this vehicle should not be perceived as another Aero variation. I understand how you feel and fully sympathize with you. In fact, I feel the same way about it being erroneously grouped with Morgan Classics.
Well you seem to have good line in misinterpretation and misleading statements.
I don't in anyway "feel strongly that this vehicle should not be perceived as another Aero variation" I love the Aero's as you well know. I actually don't really care where it is "grouped", but I do care about too much separation, the 'them and us' bullshit.
I am also happy to follow MMC's direction, in that if they call it a plus eight then that's what it is. My reasoning is that it looks like a trad.
DaveW classes by chassis. That's his personal choice and opinion. Funny how he manages to do it without sniping, and how it comes across as a genuine honest and debateable opinion? I do feel however as concours rep for the MSCC he needs to look past his own opinion and feelings, which he has alluded to.
So please stop trolling and trying to create a chasm. I thought that we had moved on from there?
But if we can remember that far back, slapping a few Ferrari body panels on a VW Beetle did not make the result a Ferrari. It remained a Beetle by any standard. Same here.
Oh yes that's absolutely exactly the same as what has happened here. Morgan have taken a Renault Clio V8 and slapped a few trad panels on it and are trying to pass it on as a Plus Eight. Fools, don't they know Katoen will see straight through that
What a stupid analogy
