I didn't watch it as I have no time for the philanderer or his complicit partner but I did read
this earlier today and thought what a pathetic under resourced poll it was
As far as him representing the Church of England with his marital history - I don't think so
Why ever not? Does the C of E actually believe in anything these days or are they always boringly inoffensive and "turn the other cheek"? Its a failing organisation by any measure and if anything even less relevant than the monarchy.
I dont like Charles for his anti technology eco nonsense views but for the life of me I cant think of an alternative who might actually take the job.
P.S. Bonking the subjects has long been a royal way of life. Its the origin of much of the nobility as well as the Fitz..... etc
I don't think we need a head of State personally, we just don't need one. Or a head of the C of E.
As far as the PS goes - just because they used to do something that way is the very best reason for changing things. I fought this for most of my working life as I was always in charge of old farts in the engineering world that were reluctant to change beyond belief.
Howard - for goodness sake just buy a Morgan and enjoy yourself so as to vent your pent up mischief
