Many so-called Morgan enthusiasts forget that MMC is first and foremost,
Actually, Simon, that might be a big difference between us. I have always thought my first loyalty is to my fellow owners. I have most in common with them. I am not in trade with the Company. Do you feel that the first priority of the MMC should be to owners or itself?Lorne
Lorne, if you are going to quote me, please ensure it is my quote and not someone else’s!
You quoted Aeroman and yet attribute the quote to myself, then follow it up with, what I consider to be, a very unworthy comment: "Actually, Simon, that might be a big difference between us. I have always thought my first loyalty is to my fellow owners."
My deep apologies Simon. It was a long post and when you press the quote button on this system, it gets very easy to make a mistake on who said what. My comments on that remark should have been attributed to Aeroman and not you. I will edit the post (if I still can) with an explanation.
you quoted someone else and stated that they are my words but you are also inferring that my primary loyalty isn't to Morgan enthusiasts?
It is very hard to interpret Aeroman's words "Many so-called Morgan enthusiasts forget that MMC is first and foremost" as suggesting a Morgan owner's primary loyalty should be to his fellow owners. I see that your reaction to that is the same as mine.
I shall put the question to Aeroman rather than you. Aeroman, in light of your comment, do you feel that the first priority of the MMC should be to owners or itself?
Simon, Was I correct in attributing the quote below to you?
there are a niche of Morgan owners who believe they are the champions of the Holy Grail that is an MMC car and it suits them just fine not to have the profile of the product raised. On the other hand, you have new owners who are enthusiastic about the car and want to shout about it from the roof tops to all and sundry.
Do the millions Morgan-informed by my efforts make me a new owner or a Champion of the Holy Grail?
Lorne
