The relevance is simply that first hand experience, over an extended period of time, is the best measure of a product. Would you disagree with that? Thus, I was wondering if you were commenting as an owner with a first hand appreciation of the topic being discussed.
I addressed this in the post.As expected, you still fail to realise, that it doesn't matter if my vehicle has a particular problem, as I'm not arguing whether or not a problem exist. I'm arguing against the attempt to shut people up that have anything negative to share, problems to be solved, or sharing their modification, and argue for stifling any discussion apart from the colour-questions, the "we went on a trip, and everything was fine" and so on.
This ought to be clear by now, but apparently one after another fail to recognise that, even after it has been explained to them several times over.
And, as I said: I fail to see the relevance, since it doesn't matter if I'm an owner or not. I don't need to own the same car as someone with a fourwheeler modifying their suspension to argue against idiots trying to argue that he should have bought an SLK instead of modifying his Morgan.
But as I have seen with so many others over the course of the past few days, when their argumentation is shown to be faulty, they will cry foul for one reason or another.
Case in point:
Quote:
I won't reply to the rest of your post because it seems exceedingly angry and unnecessarily antagonistic.
