This seems so cruel and un-fair. Surly the administrators will see if RTCC have paid someone for a car, ie "Where is the actual payment you have made for this specific car" If the car has not been paid for, then he did not have title to sell it, so it's a criminal act? So then should the buyer of the car loose out? Richard Thorne should sell his house and pay people he owes back (in and ideal world) but that won't happen.
He obviously knew there were cash flow issues a long time ago. I just don't understand why people act like this and not have paperwork and agreements in place.
