They may well be able to intimidate smaller companies into submission.
Not meant in a rude manner to you mph but that is the point. What is the value to their business in enforcing such a minor bump. Even if, as outlined, they make their own multi-million pound ironic continuation models who is honestly going to think that the customer for one would consider the other in both directions?
If JLR have made such crude mistakes in the open letter it would be shocking and a few people need to be marched to HR/Legal for a discussion on end of employment transition. All quite sad for their reputation if true. Also a shocking waste of money that needs to be put into product development right now.
However given they have given us another £100k+ model to support full range overlap this week (Defender V8) I doubt they are listening. I am just waiting for the first £80k Evoque to be released to baffle me further.
