Andrew and the US woman are moving in different worlds to the rest of us. A person dies as a result of the involvement of one who then hides behind immunity. Serious sexual abuse of underage girls by people in the social circle of the other. The first will have, I assume, police evidence of involvement whilst the second so far appears less clearcut.
Both are using their immunity status.
US prosecutors say Andrew has not made contact. Andrew’s lawyers say they tried 3 times but no response.
Typical fudging by both sides to gain media credibility.
I wonder if or when hard evidence is revealed that shows clear involvement what would happen? So far in the Andrew case there appears to be the long term close association between Epstein and himself that is suggesting involvement. With some ,so far, unsubstantiated with hard evidence, accusations by a victim. In Andrew’s case I find it amazing that with his security and advisor entourage that Andrew would not have known of Epstein’s role in the sexual abuse procurement he was running. That, to me is a strong reason to be suspicious.
Looking at the probable involvement of highly positioned “clients” of Epstein I wouldn’t be surprised at any outcome.
Beagles are becoming nervous and twitchy!

Plus Four MY23 Furka Rouge